March 14: Dahieh Security Plan Must Compel State to Take Control of Arms

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The March 14 General Secretariat hailed on Tuesday the security forces' deployment in Beirut's southern suburbs of Dahieh on Monday.

It said after its weekly meeting: “The security plan in Dahieh should act as a precursor to the state implementing its right to take control of all arms throughout Lebanon.”

It hoped that the measures in Dahieh will be implemented throughout the country.

Around 1,000 army troops and security forces deployed Monday in Dahieh where Hizbullah normally keeps a tight grip on security.

The security points were established after car bombings in the area killed 27 people on August 15 and wounded more than 50 on July 9.

Following the bombings, Hizbullah turned the southern suburbs into a fortress with guards in civilian clothes policing the streets, stopping and searching cars, and asking motorists for their identity cards.

Addressing President Michel Suleiman's participation at the United Nations General Assembly, the March 14 General Secretariat remarked: “We praise the president and international forces' efforts to provide all of Lebanon's needs during this critical time in the region.”

“The political, diplomatic, military, and financial aid will help it overcome the pressures that are threatening its political, social, economic, and security stability,” it continued.

It thanked the international support group for addressing the case of Syrian refugees in Lebanon.

It hoped that the international community would offer “clear and tangible support for the complete implementation of U.N. Security Resolution 1701 and the Baabda Declaration, which is based on keeping Lebanon away from regional crises.”

Suleiman will address world leaders at the U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday night.

On Wednesday, Suleiman along with U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon will head a meeting of an international support group for Lebanon, which is burdened by the flow of refugees from Syria.

The meeting, which will include the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, will examine ways to help Lebanon maintain political stability and security, and confront the continuous flow of Syrian refugees.

The U.N. refugee agency UNHCR has registered more than 746,000 Syrians in Lebanon, though many others remain unregistered.

The Lebanese government puts the number of Syrians in the country at 1.3 million, though that figure includes Syrians who were already in the country when the conflict began 30 months ago.

Comments 10
Default-user-icon Sid (Guest) 24 September 2013, 15:34

How about the army deploy throughout all Lebanon and assume security of the whole country. Then we do not need so called "resistance" arms (synonym for militia or illegal armed force)

Thumb lebanon_first 24 September 2013, 16:37

I thank God for having el Mostakbal as the main sunni party in lebanon. Other arab Sunnites really suck at choosing their parties. Non lebanese sunnites vote either for the hypocrite commies of muslim brotherhood or medieval salafis.

We are blessed to have our home made sunnites satisfied with the non proselyting, moderate, progressive hezb el mostakbal whose agenda is building the secular state (albeit within a sunni sphere of influence), but nonetheless in a modern and pragmatic way.

Missing phillipo 24 September 2013, 16:49

So can anyone answer a couple of questions.
A car gets stopped at an army checkpost. A search finds arms -
1. Are the arms confiscated?
2. Are the passengers arrested for illegal possession of arms?
If the answer to either of these two questions is NO, then the whole exercise is a simple waste of time and resources.

Thumb lebanon_first 24 September 2013, 16:54

philipo. they are not searching for weapons. They are searching for explosives.

Thumb jabal10452 24 September 2013, 17:46

I second lebanon_first and would like to add that the Army and Hezbollah coexist and even cooperate from time to time. There is a pragmatic attitude here: the Army does not want to fight Hezbollah even if it could; it lets the politicians handle the issue of Hezbollah's arms. I don't like Hezbollah at all but this is the best option we have right now. We need to continue talking and engaging out political opponents. Civil war is not an option. Creative and responsible diplomacy is.

Missing phillipo 24 September 2013, 18:46

So explosives aren't weapons (of mass destruction) ?

Thumb jabal10452 24 September 2013, 19:56

Phoenix and I agree on a lot of things, but we have our differences. Phoenix affords Nasrallah the courtesy of calling him "sayyed"; I call Nasrallah for what I believe he is: a guy holding a huge gun to our collective heads and basically holding the whole country hostage. I call for dealing with him like police negotiators deal with hostage takers. They try to defuse the situation without getting the hostages killed.

Thumb lebanon_first 24 September 2013, 18:59

good point texas.
Another point. Do you think that if lebanese army gets good sophisticated weapons, HA would disarm? or that is wishful thinking?

Missing phillipo 24 September 2013, 19:43

Your comments here are completely incorrect.
The Egypt - Israel Peace Agreement stated what forces would be allowed in the Sinai Peninsula. If the Egyptians didn't want that they would have objected at the time of the signing of the treaty.
When the latest troubles started with the terrorist forces in Sinai, the Eyptians requested, AND RECEIVED, Israeli permission to bring in additional forces.
It is a pity that someone like you tries to poison the atmosphere by posting information which to put it politely, is full of incorrect
details.

Missing peace 24 September 2013, 21:58

hezbis rather shoot at the army than giving up their arms to the state... they only obey to iran to whom they pledged allegiance not to lebanon!