U.N. Says Syria Peace Conference on January 22

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Syrian government and opposition negotiators will meet for the first time since start of the country's 32 month-old war in Geneva from January 22, the U.N. announced Monday.

U.N. leader Ban Ki-moon called the landmark conference "a mission of hope" to end the civil war.

But he stressed to both sides that the aiming of the meeting will be to carry out a declaration adopted by the major powers in June 2010 calling for a transitional government.

"The secretary general expects that the Syrian representatives will come to Geneva with a clear understanding that this is the objective, and with a serious intention to end a war that has already left well over 100,000 dead, driven almost nine million from their homes, left countless missing and detained, sent tremors through the region and forced unacceptable burdens on Syria's neighbors," said the U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky.

"The conflict in Syria has raged for too long. It would be unforgivable not to seize this opportunity to bring an end to the suffering and destruction it has caused," Ban said through his spokesman.

Ban praised the efforts of Russia, the United States and U.N.-Arab League envoy Lakhdar Brahimi in pressing for the conference which has been delayed several times.

Divisions in the Syrian opposition, doubts about the government's commitment to the conference and deciding whether key countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia should take part have all clouded efforts to bring the two sides together.

The conference will be a followup to a meeting held in Geneva in June 2012 when the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France -- the permanent U.N. Security Council members -- and other key states agreed a call for a transitional government.

"We will go to Geneva with a mission of hope. The Geneva conference is the vehicle for a peaceful transition that fulfills the legitimate aspirations of all the Syrian people for freedom and dignity, and which guarantees safety and protection to all communities in Syria," said Ban.

"Its goal is the full implementation of the Geneva communiqué of June 30, 2012, including the establishment, based on mutual consent, of a transitional governing body with full executive powers, including over military and security entities," he added.

The Security Council has backed the declaration in a resolution, making it legally binding.

Ban said he "will expect all regional and international partners to demonstrate their meaningful support for constructive negotiations.

"All must show vision and leadership. All can begin working now to take steps to help the Geneva conference succeed, including toward the cessation of violence, humanitarian access, release of detainees and return of Syrian refugees and internally displaced to their homes," Ban said.

Comments 6
Thumb benzona 25 November 2013, 13:59

make it june 22 after elections.... oh wait, the blind ophthalmologist will secure a 100% electoral victory again. lol

fool me once, shame on you! Fool me twice, shame on me!

Thumb Mystic 25 November 2013, 14:04

yep benzona you ought to be ashamed of yourself lol. There wont be peace in Syria while Al Qaeda is lurking around. Yes Al assad will definetly be re-elected :-)

Thumb Mystic 25 November 2013, 14:05

Then we can all make a big party, i will buy you a beer. Or if you are a radical i will yell Takbeer with you ;D hhhhhhh

Thumb EagleDawn 25 November 2013, 16:10

you funny?

Thumb mckinl 25 November 2013, 16:52

Russia never agreed to a "transitional government". They have always backed Assad and Ban Ki Moon knows it.

This is just more posturing by the opposition to try and salvage their ever worsening situation on the ground.

In the end Assad will stay as he is the only one capable of routing Qaeda and Takfiris from Syria.

All the major countries are scared to death of a broken Syria becoming a breeding ground for terrorists. Even China is seeing terrorism escalate.

Thumb AntiSheepism 25 November 2013, 18:02

Mission of hope! I really hope so but I sincerely doubt it. Even if the Assad regime and the Syrian opposition agree a deal it would be irrelevant when you have people like ISIL, Nusra and others fighting their own war in Syria. Iraq is the perfect example. When it goes out of hand then you've lost it. I hope I'm wrong because peace in Syria will translate to peace in Lebanon.

May God protect all the innocent