Obama Says U.S. Can't Turn 'Blind Eye' to Syria

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Inaction is not an option for the United States in Syria after a horrendous chemical attack, U.S. President Barack Obama said Saturday as he urged holdout lawmakers to back a military strike.

"We cannot turn a blind eye to images like the ones we've seen out of Syria," Obama said in his weekly address.

"That's why I call on members of Congress, from both parties, to come together and stand up for the kind of world we want to live in; the kind of world we want to leave our children and future generations."

Congress reconvenes on Monday and Obama addresses the nation on Tuesday about a possible U.S. response to the August 21 attack that left hundreds dead on the outskirts of Damascus.

But he has already acknowledged that convincing lawmakers to back military action against the Syrian regime would be a "heavy lift."

According to a Washington Post survey, 224 of the current 433 House members were either "no" or "leaning no" on military action as of Friday. A large number, 184, were undecided, with just 25 backing a strike.

The skepticism is also prevalent among the people the lawmakers represent.

A Gallup survey showed 51 percent of Americans oppose strikes in Syria compared to 36 percent in favor, a larger opposition ratio than before the onset of the Gulf War of 1991, Kosovo (1999), Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003).

In his address, Obama said he wanted to strike Syria and punish President Bashar Assad's regime.

"This was not only a direct attack on human dignity; it is a serious threat to our national security," he said.

"That's why, last weekend, I announced that, as commander in chief, I decided that the United States should take military action against the Syrian regime."

Obama warned that if the United States fails to respond to the "outrageous attack," Assad could use the chemical weapons again, or they could fall in the hands of "terrorists."

"It would send a horrible signal to other nations that there would be no consequences for their use of these weapons," he added.

However, Obama also stressed that he was asking for congressional authorization because "our country will be stronger if we act together, and our actions will be more effective."

As he faces a war-weary American public after more than a decade of protracted conflicts in the Middle East and Afghanistan, Obama insisted that any U.S. strike in Syria "is not an open-ended intervention."

"This would not be another Iraq or Afghanistan. There would be no American boots on the ground. Any action we take would be limited, both in time and scope -- designed to deter the Syrian government from gassing its own people again and degrade its ability to do so," the president added.

"I know that the American people are weary after a decade of war, even as the war in Iraq has ended, and the war in Afghanistan is winding down. That's why we're not putting our troops in the middle of somebody else's war."

The Senate is expected to vote next week on allowing a limited attack, while the House is due to vote within the next two weeks, according to Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.

Comments 10
Thumb _-_wolf_-_ 07 September 2013, 13:40

The US can't turn a Blind Eye towards Syria ?
Mr . President we are still awaiting the 100% proof on " WHO USED THE CW ! "
Otherwise you will be creating too many " Blind Eyes " in our Region !
Death upon Death is not a Solution , it only adds to the problems !!!
No more WAR ! NO MORE IRAQ ! NO MORE AFGHANISTAN !
Signed Wolf !!

Missing hb9z 07 September 2013, 23:18

NO more Baschar either..........

Thumb kanaanljdid 07 September 2013, 13:40

Labeik ya Obama!

Default-user-icon bashar (Guest) 07 September 2013, 14:45

Obama will never attack. Hes getting scared of the repurcussions
Hes trying to back ouy but wants congress to make the final 'back out' decision so he doesnt look like a scared president who doesnt stay true to his word

Thumb liberty 07 September 2013, 15:29

What a bunch of sectarian haters all of you. If Bashar was a Sunni not a Shia and he was doing what he has been doing, you and your terrorist militia HA will now be fighting in Syria along with the Nusra to oust him.

Default-user-icon Wahshon Debarrary (Guest) 07 September 2013, 17:49

Turning a blind eye on Saudi Arabia and its criminal conglomerate known as Al-Qaeda Multilingualis and on Israel, the most criminal nation on the face of the earth, must have taught the US what it means to turn a blind eye and when! This is called morality of the lowest possible degree, one that is even lower than that of the criminals mentioned above. Superpower, my left foot!

Thumb kanaandian 07 September 2013, 19:44

he wants to punish assad for using his chemicals, why doesn't he want to punish the savage rebels for beheadings various priests?

Thumb ironlikelion 07 September 2013, 21:26

No offense big john, but I wouldn't hold my breath while waiting for Israel to disappear if I were you...

Missing hb9z 07 September 2013, 23:20

you need to get yourself a new crystal ball ya southern because you read the future I can tell and you are a specialist in the constitution of democratic countries and organizations......esmala a lek....

Missing hb9z 07 September 2013, 23:21

bravo ya peace lover , exactly my opinion